Food & Wine Pros

From the archives: Does Bordeaux need butter?

From the archives: Does Bordeaux need butter?

Italian wines with olive oil-based dishes, Bordeaux with butter-based ones. Sound like a no-brainer? Well, yes, if you happen to be in either region: you obviously drink the local wine with the local food. But just think for a moment about today’s top international restaurants.

Olive oil is much more likely to be the favoured cooking medium than butter - or duck fat for that matter. So where does that leave Bordeaux? Or international variants on Bordeaux grape varieties? And does that rule out classic French-inspired cuisine with Italian wines?

It was wine consultant Hugo Rose MW who first got me thinking about these issues. He’d picked up on a comment by Angelo Gaja who had expressed the view that his wines were best enjoyed in the company of olive-oil based dishes. Hugo had wondered if the reverse was true of Bordeaux. “If you look at the (Bordeaux) region olives are not found either in the vineyards or in the kitchen. If you speak to the Bordelais about olive oil the advice tends to be to use it very sparingly and only with salad.”

I invited Hugo to join me to put the theory to the test at one of London’s best neighbourhood restaurants Aubergine in Fulham (now closed), whose Michelin-starred chef William Drabble is able to turn his hand to either style. In front of us we had 8 wines - three Bordeaux, two Italian - a Chianti Classico and a Barolo - and three New World wines - an Australian Cabernet and a Californian Merlot and Pinot Noir. (Bear in mind this tasting took place in 2005 when you look at the vintages but I think the conclusions still apply)

The first exercise was to see how they went with olive oil. We had three different examples, a light, herby, slightly spicy Provencal oil called Alziari, an intensely grassy, peppery oil from Frescobaldi in Tuscany, and a richly fruity Spanish oil from Valdueza (all supplied by The Oil Merchant)

As anticipated, our Bordeaux, which included a ‘99 La Tour Figeac (Saint-Emilion), a 2000 Chateau Talbot (St Julien) and a 1989 Chateau Dauzac (Margaux) struggled, the most versatile match being the muscular, more tannic Talbot. But interestingly we found that it didn’t make a huge difference to our wines how powerful the flavour of the oil was. The Frescobaldi was particularly difficult - true - with the La Tour Figeac but the much milder Alziari also tended to make both it and the Dauzac taste astringent.

Our Chianti - a 2001 La Pieve Rodere Il Palazzino - went predictably well with the Tuscan Frescobaldi but not as well as a 1997 Barolo Cannubi from E Pira & Figli which was also excellent with the Spanish oil. The Californian Merlot, a Duckhorn 2001, worked well with the Tuscan and Spanish oils (better in my view than Hugo’s) but not at all well with the milder Provencal one while the Cabernet, a still-vibrant 1998 Houghton Jack Mann, clashed quite horribly with the Valdueza but fared better than the Bordeaux with the Frescobaldi. As did the Pinot Noir - a Peter Michael Le Moulin Rouge 1999. Conclusion? Like cheese, olive oil can create problems for any kind of red, not just Bordeaux.

Next we tried our wines with three different dishes cooked in duck fat, butter and olive oil, bringing in a much wider range of flavours and textures. First off was a south-west inspired ballotine of confit duck with a foie gras ‘vinaigrette’ and caramelised onions. It should have gone with the three Bordeaux and did so perfectly with the St Emilion and older Dauzac but less well with the more tannic Talbot. Hugo and I disagreed about how well it went with the Barolo (I liked it, he didn’t) and the other Bordeaux varietals - Hugo favoured the Duckhorn Merlot while I thought it went slightly better with the Jack Mann Cabernet but we agreed it didn’t do the Chianti and Pinot Noir any favours at all. A Bordeaux-biased dish, then, but not just any Bordeaux. More traditional, more mature, restrained styles worked better.

The next dish, a pithivier (puff pastry pie) of quail with a very rich red wine and butter sauce, should have been natural Bordeaux territory but it was really only the Talbot which coped with its intensity. Much better were the Barolo and the Duckhorn Merlot for which it was almost the perfect dish. It wasn’t pleasant at all with the Chianti or the Jack Mann and made the pinot noir taste too jammy though it picked up nicely on the mushrooms in the recipe. Result? No regional bias at all to the wine matches. Piedmont and California proved just as good as Bordeaux.

Finally, an all-Mediterranean dish of lamb cooked with olive oil, rosemary, olives and aubergines, fertile territory, you’d think for our Chianti for which it was certainly the best, if not outstanding match. But it was convincingly outclassed by the Barolo and the Duckhorn Merlot. The Bordeaux didn’t seem as uncongenial as one might have imagined, the smoother, more mellow Dauzac and La Tour Figeac being a more attractive pairing than the Talbot but the anticipated lamb and cabernet marriage didn’t happen with the Jack Mann which surprisingly worked less well than the Peter Michael Pinot Noir. Outcome: Mediterranean flavours don’t necessarily need Mediterranean wines.

In such a brief session, it’s hard to reach definitive conclusions except to say that the wide disparity in styles in any region make it hard to make generalisations of the Bordeaux = butter, Italian wines = olive oil variety. Two factors make any match more challenging - firm tannins in a wine and astringency or pungency in an oil. A tentative conclusion might be that much-maligned merlot is a more forgiving grape variety than cabernet - or young cabernet at least - and that Barolo should be considered more often as a dining option when a table is ordering a range of different dishes.

The best matches

  • With the duck confit and foie gras vinaigrette

The 1999 La Tour Figeac and 2001 Duckhorn Merlot were Hugo’s top choices, the La Tour Figeac and the 1989 Dauzac were mine. Yes, Bordeaux and dishes based on duck fat work well - no surprise there.

  • With the pithivier of quail and red wine butter sauce

Hugo and I both awarded our best marks to the Chateau Talbot, Barolo Cannubi and Duckhorn Merlot, indicating no particular regional bias for butter (The Barolo outcome is not so surprising when you remember that butter rather than oil was the fat traditionally used in Northern Italy)

  • With the roast chump of lamb with provencal vegetables, olives and rosemary

A slight divergence again: Hugo rated the Duckhorn Merlot, Barolo and Pinot noir most highly. I favoured the Barolo, Merlot and La Tour Figeac. The Chianti was good but not as good as we expected.

What else to drink with oil- or butter-infused dishes

  • Chardonnay almost always works well with a butter-based sauce as it does with a creamy one. The richer the dish, the better the chardonnay. Meursault and similarly rich chardonnays are superb with a hollandaise, lobster cooked in butter or a steak bearnaise: lighter styles of white burgundy such as Puligny or cool climate New World chardonnay with a beurre blanc.
  • Rich southern French whites - blends of Marsanne, Roussanne and Viognier - from the Languedoc or Rhone are a good alternative
  • Mediterranean-style olive oil-based fish dishes using red mullet or seabass work exceptionally well with strong, dry ros especially if the dish includes olives or tapenade. I was drinking brilliantly well - and cheaply - from the Costieres de Nimes this summer.
  • Dry Italian whites such as Soave and Lugana seem made for dishes with basil-infused oil or with pesto.
  • Albarino would be my wine of choice with spanish style hake cooked with olive oil and garlic or with salsa verde.

This article was first published in Decanter in October 2005

Red wine and red meat - what could possibly go wrong?

Red wine and red meat - what could possibly go wrong?

Wine writer Stuart Walton casts a sceptical eye over accepted wisdom:

Can there any more dependable rule of thumb when it comes to gastronomic partnering than red wines with red meats? It’s as though it’s the one piece of advice that hardly needs any qualifying. The big, muscular structures of most red wines are what the sinewy, densely textured or highly flavoured qualities of red meat need.

Like many another guideline, though, it turns out to have its range of exceptions. And if there is one basic principle behind the mismatches, it is that the wine is too heavy for the food.

I was reminded of this point at a recent press lunch, where the wines of highly regarded Chilean producer Aurelio Montes (who has interests in Argentina and the Napa too) were paired with some fairly straightforward dishes. A three-year-old Reserve Cabernet Sauvignon that has benefited from a judicious oaking regime – some of the wine barrel-aged, some not, some of the oak new, some not, all of it French – with roast rack of lamb? Sounds a no-brainer.

In fact, it missed by a country mile, principally because the tannic edge on the wine was still quite keen, and there was an unfashionable, distinctly mdocain astringency to it. Alongside the pink-cooked lamb, which was served in one piece and was on the distinctly fatty side, the wine wasn’t having any of it. The softness of the meat and the only lightly rendered fat needed something correspondingly softer to accompany it.

We often assume that fattiness in food needs something in the wine to cut through it. In the case of red wines with fatty red meats (duck would be another good example), that cutting-edge comes much more digestibly in the form of ripe acidity than greenish tannin. Of the two supposedly safe bets with lamb – Bordeaux and Rioja – the latter wins out for me far more often, just because the textures of a Rioja Reserva are more sympathetic to the meat than most claret, at least when the wine is anything less than a decade old.

Too much alcohol, the bane of many southern-hemisphere and even some European wines these days, is a besetting problem. Anything north of 13.5% leaves a burn in the back of the throat that can detract from the flavour of meat, as well as even the most assertive saucing and seasoning.

The relative weight issue is best demonstrated by partnering red meats with red wines that should on paper be too gentle. One of the best-kept secrets of an often unjustly derided wine region, Beaujolais, is that its most illustrious wines are great with red meats. Try a Morgon with a couple of years’ bottle-age with your next joint of beef, and you may well find yourself pleasantly astonished at the balance. It can be pitch-perfect.

But what about the spiciest treatments, you may well wonder? Can a midweight red really stand up to, say, peppered steak, lamb rogan josh, or Mexican-spiced dishes? Wouldn’t they be better off with a big, belting Zinfandel or the burliest Australian Shiraz? Not so, in my experience. Again, massive alcohol just gets in the way. It can painfully accentuate the smoulder of chilli or black pepper on the palate in a wholly unappealing way.

What’s needed instead with spicy dishes is an opulent layer of flesh in the wine, big fruit, supple tannins, and perhaps a little intrinsic spice of its own, though that last isn’t mandatory. A youngish, gingery-peppery Crozes-Hermitage can go great guns with highly spiced dishes, but the svelte tones of an oak-burnished Merlot, from Chile, California or New Zealand, can be even better.

All of this begs the question as to what those great strapping bully-boys of the red wine world are really for, since they aren’t much fun to drink on their own. They do have the necessary brawn to stand up well sometimes to very mature, hard cow’s-milk cheeses. Otherwise, I’m increasingly finding that I don’t know the answer to that question.

Stuart Walton is a long-serving food and wine writer, a contributor to the Good Food Guide, and author of The Right Food with the Right Wine.

About FionaAbout FionaAbout Matching Food & WineAbout Matching Food & WineWork with meWork with me
Loading