News & views

The trouble with wine tasting

The trouble with wine tasting

Zoom tastings have been hugely popular during lockdown for understandable reasons. Unable to travel or get to tastings in person it's a good way to keep up with new releases or learn more about a wine region.

They definitely have their advantages in terms of fewer bottles to taste and access to winemakers who might not always have time to make themselves available in person to journalists on a press trip. Having the opportunity to dip into a wine over 24 hours or longer, particularly with food, also gives you a much more rounded impression of a wine too. But are decanted samples - on which these tastings are mainly based - a fair representation of what's actually in the bottle?

Wines of Australia has done a number of tastings based on mini bottles but has arranged for delivery of the wines at the last minute so that the samples don't deteriorate. I've received other samples where the quality hasn't been so reliable.

It's obviously expensive both from the point of view of the amount of wine and the cost of delivering it to send out whole bottles but maybe it's the only way to ensure the recipient gets them in the same condition as those they're writing for or selling to.

Of course it's not the only variable in terms of a tasting experience as I highlighted on my now defunct blog Wine Naturally back in 2012 and thought would be worth a re-run.

"I had a bad start to a wine tasting a few days ago. The first eight to ten wines I tried - all red - tasted unforgiving and mean with unusually high acidity and edgy tannins. As the tasting was the Wine Society’s, whose wines I generally admire, I wondered whether the fault was mine, not theirs.

I had started the tasting unusually early just before it opened at 10am. The wines were a little cold - most had just been opened and the room was a chillier than usual 18°C. I’d been travelling for two days and hadn’t slept brilliantly the night before. I had a claggy throat that was threatening to turn into a cold. It was a leaf day. It could have been any one of those things.

I went back at the end of the tasting and re-tasted the wines, slightly warmer now, with less in the bottle and found them more giving in a couple of instances but not a great deal changed in others. I then went on to another short tasting with a chef - in a slightly warmer room - where the wines seemed to show more character. So maybe it was room temperature. Or a more relaxed congenial atmosphere? Who knows?

It got me thinking about other factors that might affect the way you taste:

How long the wine has been opened and whether it’s been decanted
Some producers even reckon their wines are better opened the previous day. Three of the wines at the Wine Society had been decanted ‘to get rid of sediment’. That would have also opened them up.

How much is left in the bottle
The first sip you taste from a full bottle is inevitably going to be different from one of the last

How many wines you’ve tasted beforehand
At supermarket tastings you’re often faced with 120 wines - sometimes more. At wine competitions, twice or three times that. Even the best tasters must suffer from some degree of palate fatigue

What type of wine preceded the one you’re tasting
They should be placed in style order but often they’re grouped by country and price so you may taste an smooth, expensively made wine before a cheaper, lighter-bodied one. If you’re tasting wines of the same type - particularly young, high alcohol reds, it becomes more and more difficult to differentiate between them

Whether it’s a tank sample or a finished wine
Or if it’s a mass-produced wine which is bottled on demand, which batch you get and how well the wine is stored in transit

How familiar with or sympathetic you are to that particular style of wine
Where natural wines may fare badly in a line-up. And I have a problem, as admitted in the blog, with soupy reds.

How long since you’ve eaten and how much
Most people say they taste better in the morning - I certainly find it hard to taste well after anything other than a light lunch. How strongly flavoured and/or spicy the food you eat will also make a difference.

How well - or badly - you’ve slept
A noisy room, an unfamiliar bed, too much food or drink the night before, a pressing deadline can all affect how well you sleep. As can . . .

Whether you’re jet-lagged and tasting in a different time zone

What temperature the room is and whether it’s air-conditioned
See my initial remarks. I think the air conditioning is the more significant factor here. I rarely have any problems tasting in a wine cellar at 18°C

Whether there are extraneous smells
Perfume and after-shave being the obvious culprits (it’s surprising how many still wear it to tastings) but the smell of the lunchtime food being prepared - or even laid out - can be distracting too

The weather
Not so much a question of whether it’s wet or sunny but of the atmospheric pressure. Very much more competently explored than I could by The Wine Doctor, Chris Kissack though unfortunately I can't now find the link.

The biodynamic calendar
A more controversial one. I didn’t know it was a leaf day before the tasting. I checked (the app When Wine Tastes Best is useful) when I’d got through my first 10 wines. Sometimes it doesn’t seem to make a blind bit of difference - a wine tastes disappointing, I find it’s a fruit day. Hard to prove either way.

The pyschological state of the taster
Relaxed or tense and stressed?

Industry professionals such as MWs will no doubt tell me that if you follow an accepted tasting protocol in your assessments that these variations are marginal but I’m not sure. They’re not superhuman. They worry about their kids. They feel liverish just like the rest of us. Inevitably how we feel must affect the way we engage with a wine.

I remember the late Gerard Basset before the World’s Best Sommelier awards in Chile a couple of years ago barely eating anything, terrified that something might affect his palate or, worse still, upset his stomach.

The implication of course is that you should try and taste wines at least twice before scoring or pronouncing on them - something I try to do but which is not always possible given the tight deadlines we all work to.

Maybe we all need to be a bit more mindful though as I argued in this post.

Food for thought, anyway. What do you think?

Photo by K.Decha at shutterstock.com

Why Domaine Huet was wrong to ban Chris Kissack

Why Domaine Huet was wrong to ban Chris Kissack

The decision of Domaine Huet to ban the influential commentator Chris Kissack from tasting their wines at this years Salon des Vins de Loire which has been extensively documented in his blog Winedoctor is the latest example of a sneaking trend that wines are only made available, visits arranged, samples sent or comped meals or rooms provided in return for a ‘review’, the assumption being that review will be favourable.

A similar thing happened to me a couple of years back when I was not allowed to a tasting because I had critically reviewed - not that critically, mind you - the West London restaurant where it was held, Hedone. Jim Budd has also been banned - by Huet again.

I suppose it’s the natural outcome of the shift to citizen journalism when wine lovers, never having dreamed of becoming a writer on their favourite subject start their own blogs, are thrilled to get invitations to tastings and disinclined to bite the hand that feeds them. One blogger (not pictured in the group below) described Huet’s owner Sarah Hwang as “a dynamic charming young lady” who was "kind enough to let me bug her with a few questions on the domains" (They also own one in Tokaji.) I’m sure that’s more the style of coverage the Hwang family are looking for, presumably still smarting from the shock resignation of their highly regarded winemaker Noel Pinguet in 2012. Interestingly there are no recent reviews on the press section of their website.

Shouldn’t we all pay our own way and buy our own samples though - or get the publication we write for to pay for them? It’s an ideal solution but one few of us have the budgets or flush enough employers to make possible that given the number of wines we all taste a week.

Given the constrictions of space, most of us only write up the wines we rate rather than review a producer’s whole portfolio as Kissack does (his reviews of Huet’s wines go back to the1949 vintage) but shouldn’t a producer be grateful that someone of his specialist knowledge - a long term customer as well as a writer - devotes the time to do that?

Quite apart from the media storm the Huet debacle has caused the whole episode seems incredibly short-sighted. I’m sure far more people have read Chris’s post than would have otherwise done. He’ll buy the wines and review them anyway, I’m sure fairly although many will regard the domain less favourably on his behalf. Let’s hope it makes other producers think twice about imposing restrictions on who can taste their wines.

What do you think? Under what circumstances - if any - should a producer refuse to let a wine critic or blogger taste their wines?

Pictures taken on my own visit to Huët in October 2010.

Main image credit: jamesonf, CC BY 2.0

About FionaAbout FionaAbout Matching Food & WineAbout Matching Food & WineWork with meWork with me
Loading