News & views

The trouble with wine tasting
Zoom tastings have been hugely popular during lockdown for understandable reasons. Unable to travel or get to tastings in person it's a good way to keep up with new releases or learn more about a wine region.
They definitely have their advantages in terms of fewer bottles to taste and access to winemakers who might not always have time to make themselves available in person to journalists on a press trip. Having the opportunity to dip into a wine over 24 hours or longer, particularly with food, also gives you a much more rounded impression of a wine too. But are decanted samples - on which these tastings are mainly based - a fair representation of what's actually in the bottle?
Wines of Australia has done a number of tastings based on mini bottles but has arranged for delivery of the wines at the last minute so that the samples don't deteriorate. I've received other samples where the quality hasn't been so reliable.
It's obviously expensive both from the point of view of the amount of wine and the cost of delivering it to send out whole bottles but maybe it's the only way to ensure the recipient gets them in the same condition as those they're writing for or selling to.
Of course it's not the only variable in terms of a tasting experience as I highlighted on my now defunct blog Wine Naturally back in 2012 and thought would be worth a re-run.
"I had a bad start to a wine tasting a few days ago. The first eight to ten wines I tried - all red - tasted unforgiving and mean with unusually high acidity and edgy tannins. As the tasting was the Wine Society’s, whose wines I generally admire, I wondered whether the fault was mine, not theirs.
I had started the tasting unusually early just before it opened at 10am. The wines were a little cold - most had just been opened and the room was a chillier than usual 18°C. I’d been travelling for two days and hadn’t slept brilliantly the night before. I had a claggy throat that was threatening to turn into a cold. It was a leaf day. It could have been any one of those things.
I went back at the end of the tasting and re-tasted the wines, slightly
warmer now, with less in the bottle and found them more giving in a
couple of instances but not a great deal changed in others. I then went
on to another short tasting with a chef - in a slightly warmer room -
where the wines seemed to show more character. So maybe it was room
temperature. Or a more relaxed congenial atmosphere? Who knows?
It got me thinking about other factors that might affect the way you taste:
How long the wine has been opened and whether it’s been decanted
Some producers even reckon their wines are better opened the previous
day. Three of the wines at the Wine Society had been decanted ‘to get
rid of sediment’. That would have also opened them up.
How much is left in the bottle
The first sip you taste from a full bottle is inevitably going to be different from one of the last
How many wines you’ve tasted beforehand
At supermarket tastings you’re often faced with 120 wines - sometimes
more. At wine competitions, twice or three times that. Even the best
tasters must suffer from some degree of palate fatigue
What type of wine preceded the one you’re tasting
They should be placed in style order but often they’re grouped by
country and price so you may taste an smooth, expensively made wine
before a cheaper, lighter-bodied one. If you’re tasting wines of the
same type - particularly young, high alcohol reds, it becomes more and
more difficult to differentiate between them
Whether it’s a tank sample or a finished wine
Or if it’s a mass-produced wine which is bottled on demand, which batch you get and how well the wine is stored in transit
How familiar with or sympathetic you are to that particular style of wine
Where natural wines may fare badly in a line-up. And I have a problem, as admitted in the blog, with soupy reds.
How long since you’ve eaten and how much
Most people say they taste better in the morning - I certainly find it
hard to taste well after anything other than a light lunch. How strongly
flavoured and/or spicy the food you eat will also make a difference.
How well - or badly - you’ve slept
A noisy room, an unfamiliar bed, too much food or drink the night
before, a pressing deadline can all affect how well you sleep. As can . .
.
Whether you’re jet-lagged and tasting in a different time zone
What temperature the room is and whether it’s air-conditioned
See my initial remarks. I think the air conditioning is the more
significant factor here. I rarely have any problems tasting in a wine
cellar at 18°C
Whether there are extraneous smells
Perfume and after-shave being the obvious culprits (it’s surprising how
many still wear it to tastings) but the smell of the lunchtime food
being prepared - or even laid out - can be distracting too
The weather
Not so much a question of whether it’s wet or sunny but of the
atmospheric pressure. Very much more competently explored than I could
by The Wine Doctor, Chris Kissack though unfortunately I can't now find the link.
The biodynamic calendar
A more controversial one. I didn’t know it was a leaf day before the tasting. I checked (the app When Wine Tastes Best is useful) when I’d got through my first 10 wines. Sometimes it doesn’t
seem to make a blind bit of difference - a wine tastes disappointing, I
find it’s a fruit day. Hard to prove either way.
The pyschological state of the taster
Relaxed or tense and stressed?
Industry professionals such as MWs will no doubt tell me that if you
follow an accepted tasting protocol in your assessments that these
variations are marginal but I’m not sure. They’re not superhuman. They
worry about their kids. They feel liverish just like the rest of us.
Inevitably how we feel must affect the way we engage with a wine.
I remember the late Gerard Basset before the World’s Best Sommelier awards in
Chile a couple of years ago barely eating anything, terrified that
something might affect his palate or, worse still, upset his stomach.
The implication of course is that you should try and taste wines at
least twice before scoring or pronouncing on them - something I try to
do but which is not always possible given the tight deadlines we all
work to.
Maybe we all need to be a bit more mindful though as I argued in this post.
Food for thought, anyway. What do you think?
Photo by K.Decha at shutterstock.com

In praise of mindful wine tasting
A post from the archives that still holds good today ...
The other day I spent a good hour thinking about just four wines I was going to feature in a tasting*. I went back to them several times then re-tried them the next day to get the best sense I could of what they had to offer and how they’d pair with food.
That’s the absolute antithesis of the way professional wine tasters normally proceed. Huge line-up of wines. Pick up a glass, swirl, nose, slurp, spit. Repeat 150-odd times.
If you’re an experienced taster it reveals what the standout wines are and which are the ones not worth bothering about it but it in no way replicates the way the people we’re writing for would drink those wines, sipping (or - OK - gulping) them over a period of time, usually with a meal. There’s absolutely no joy in it.
Round about the same time I also tried - and re-tried - a case of six Beaujolais which changed massively in the 48 hours I had them open. The showier ones didn’t always stay showy. The more retiring ones that had tasted a bit one-dimensional often blossomed with a particular food (I tried them with different types of charcuterie and cheeses).
The way wines reveal themselves once the bottle is open gives you an insight to the way they will age. Tasting over a period of time also evens out the particular circumstances of the moment: the conditions in the room, the state of mind you’re in - even whether you’re tasting on a fruit or root day**, The mere act of swallowing rather than spitting is a more relaxed, less aggressive process that allows you to appreciate flavours and textures in the wine that might otherwise go undetected.
In an ideal world one would always taste wines over a certain price level - say £10 - like this. Why not cheaper wines too? Because they’re less complex, WISIWYG (What you See is What you Get) wines, designed for immediate consumption. But a more expensive wine will evolve in the glass and in the bottle as air interacts with it.
Until we all became overly concerned about putting people off wine the art of tasting was referred to as wine appreciation, a more accurate description of trying to understand what a wine is all about. Maybe we should use a more on-trend description these days - mindful wine tasting - for thinking more deeply about wine. I plan to do more of it.
* the wines, if you're interested, were a Bruno Giacosa Roero Arneis, an Askos Verdeca, a Tiefenbrunner Lagrein and a Querciabella Chianti Classico, all from Armit Wines
** the term comes from the biodynamic calendar which divides the year up into four types of day - fruit and flower days (better for tasting) and leaf and root days (less good). Sounds like a lot of mumbo-jumbo but it’s surprising how often I find when I’m disappointed in a wine it turns out to be a leaf or a root day. Read more about biodynamics here.
You might also enjoy this longer post on the variables of wine tasting
Latest post

Most popular
.jpg)
My latest book

News and views
.jpg)


